Tuesday, January 26, 2016

1-26-16 Viewing Bollywood's Pyaasa

A movie shrouded in darkness, the viewer is presented with Guru Dutt's misfortunate, educated poet Vijay that endlessly struggles to be recognized for the talents of his craft that he went to school for.The general theme of sorrow and misfortune permeate the story as the vast majority of the scenes before Vijay wakes up from his coma. The same can generally be said of the score the audience hears. Vijay is featured in a majority of slow and somber musical scores and the only moments that ever become upbeat or positive are when Vijay is day-dreaming or when he runs into Gulab as she is reciting his poetry. The film attempts to capture the importance of artistry and poetry despite society not allotting any value or credence to such a craft and in many ways it does a good job of making this depiction but what caught my attention was the ways in which the romantic interests, Meena and Gulab are represented, the roles they play and what Dutt does to progress the narrative of these two characters and how Vijay is perhaps not a character to be whole-heartedly lauded or empathized with.
Vijay is nothing like Kapoor’s tramp character from Shree 420 in that he is not exactly a good protagonist. The earliest invitation to the character we learn that he is a struggling poet that, while indisputably talented, refuses to compromise his poetry by writing run-of-the-mill sentimental poems. As a result, he struggles. Vijay can’t get published, often can’t afford to eat, has no permanent home and often relies on others. One of the few isolated instances of Vijay attempting to help himself was when he acted as a coolie to (presumably) a taxi drive for some money to pay for that nights meal. Unfortunately, his efforts were fruitless in the sense that his payment turned out to be fake tender which nearly cost him his shirt only that he had his meal paid for him by Gulab which Vijay took as a form of pity for him. Gulab being a sex worker that has her own struggles to deal with, still offers to help someone in need despite her own situation in life.
Afterwards Vijay is left feeling as dejected as he was before. Even his friend and his friend’s female companion call Vijay a child. albeit jokingly, but the sentiment is true. Vijay clings to maintaining the integrity of his art and his pride as a poet but refuses to make any attempts at helping himself out in any way other than through his art. He is borderline narcissistic especially when early in the film, Vijay is shown haplessly trailing after a seductive singing Gulab wherein this scene it is interpreted a romantic gesture between Gulab and Vijay, following the many zoomed in shots of Gulab giving off sultry looks to Vijay, but also as a representation of Vijay chasing after his own art, his poetry, that Gulab happens to be singing. But then we have Gulab.
Gulab is an extremely hard-working mother that works as a sex-worker whom still is able to appreciate the arts by going out of her way to purchase some of Vijay’s works. She seems to be a common trope character for bollywood films who embodies all the Indian nationalistic values and morals as she is a very spirited, hard-working, open-hearted, selfless individual. She’s depicted as wearing what appears to be more traditional Indian clothing similar to the romantic interest in Shree 420, often the only illuminated element in most scenes, especially with Vijay as he is usually off-center or shadowed in some way. Gulab also exhibits a strong passion for Vijay though, wishing for him to succeed as she supports him even in his “death” which according to the one of the viewpoints from viewingbollywood.blogspot.com is part of what traditional Indian femininity looks like. This character being the powerful visage of what it means to be Indian comes as an impressively progressive one, particularly for the time, as among all of her outstanding qualities Gulab is in fact a sex-worker which typically is viewed with intense disdain and pity but Dutt makes a strong effort to remind the viewer of just how great she is through her actions that we forget she is a sex-worker until we’re faced with the jarring scene that features her performing for a client where her child is crying in the background.
It comes as no surprise then that the cover art for the film has Gulab front and center, taking up over half of the image next to Vijay. Gulab is the character that deserves to be appraised. Vijay is without a doubt talented, intelligent, and makes considerably apt and poignant commentary about society of the day in his poems, but he falls short in the other aforementioned ways whereas Gulab is the character that is a single mother, works a job and still has the kindness in her to aid the floundering yet talented artist that is Vijay. Gulab goes as far as using all her assets available to her just to have Vijay’s works published. Actions of a true protagonist to which has a foil meant to enhance her image -- through Meena.
Meena, however is a misjudged character in this series because we’re given a lot of reason as viewers to dislike her for her “materialism” and lack of morals when it comes to selling her love for wealth as Vijay puts it. Her interaction with Vijay at Mr. Ghosh’s party shows both the absurdity of Vijay’s expectations he put on Meena in the past and also how strong-willed Meena actually is. Dutt makes it quite apparent during Vijay’s song at the party that there was still residual love between Vijay and Meena as multiple times the camera fixates and zooms past party-goers to an isolated Meena standing in an empty hallway, or where we see Meena leaning against a doorway looking almost longingly at a singing Vijay, holding her hand over her mouth to mask her true emotions for Vijay.
After Vijay finishes reciting his poetry, he meets with Meena and they argue about why Meena left him. Vijay poises his argument in a fashion that shows Meena as being selfish for leaving him to marry into wealth with Mr. Ghosh when she apparently should have stayed with him and support him in his artistic endeavours. In an attempt to reinforce Vijay’s importance, he is depicted in his all white robes against a generally darker backdrop where he is often in direct lighting to set him apart from everything and everyone else, Meena included in her dark garb. Meena barely defends herself from Vijay’s accusations of abandonment and selfishness but in her saying she no longer wanted to be poor with Vijay, a stubborn man that refuses to work to support neither himself nor her, she doesn’t truly need to defend her decision to leave him. Whether or not Meena believed that Vijay’s artistic talents would ever amount to anything is not important -- symbolically, it may be -- but realistically, to the character, her well-being is arguably more paramount.
In the end, Guru Dutt produces a film that does wonders to bring to light the hypocrisy and corruption in society through a relatively dark and somber visual and musical experience as well as create what may be hailed as two strong female roles to contrast one another and yet show both ways that they thrive in the environment they find themselves in.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

1-19-16 Viewing Bollywood

In Shri 420, the post-colonial world that Raj finds himself in a place where no longer does personal integrity and honesty suffice for leading a profitable or comfortable life. As a result of India being politically and economically vacated by their colonial suppressors, India is challenged by the world's influences and to support itself after losing a large fraction of its structural integrity at the loss of Great Britain's previous hold. The problem that they're left with is the struggle between whether or not to accept Western values and economics. Maya acts as the catalyst to show the corruption of Westernizing from her garb to her manipulation of Raj and desire for money.

The film depicts a man who works his entrepreneurial spirit in Bombay where money is all that matters. An entrepreneurial spirit however is merely a mirror of a 420, a liar or cheat. Raj talks with some of his mates outside of Mr Dharmanand where his mate expresses his disappointment with honest work because it is no longer enough. Raj is a hyper optimist that believes in honesty and finding work but despite his degree, he still struggles. With influence from Maya, Raj essentially begins operating as a wolf of wall street in a sense, selling bogus bonds to people for pure profit.

The movie shows how the nation is in somewhat of turmoil as this Western culture and set of values bleeds into the more traditional lifestyle of people living in India. The very reason for Raj leaving the countryside to Bombay is also a reflection of the times changing in that urbanization and cities have become the space for profit and success. Just as the rural and suburban forms of profit become strained, so do the feelings of National identity as more traditional values, clothing, etc are slowly lost or merged with global influences – namely that of the West.

Interesting that Seth Dharmanand, the epitome of Western profiteering drives a vehicle with a license plate that reads 840 which is two times that of 420, the number that signifies a liar and a cheat, suggesting that in order to achieve his level of opulence, one must be two times as conniving.

At the end it would seem as though Raj realizes the corruption and problem that comes with acting in a purely profiteering manner such as Western economics permits and suggests is the ideal regardless of moral complications. As Raj realizes what he has become, he recants it entirely only to return to Vidya, what it means to be a hard-worker, honest, and good person.

As for the article by Sahai, he chronicles the similarities between Raj Kapoor and Charlie Chaplin in their scope of film and also the achievements they made in their respective circles. Sahai makes sure not to claim Chaplin is better or worse than Kapoor but refers to the the individual merits of both. The idea is that Kapoor made strong motions to "Indianize" Chaplin as Sahai says in his paper. This representation of Indian socio-economic and cultural struggles was imported into Kapoor's tramp characters to create a more relatable protagonist for Indian film than the Chaplin tramp character. In doing so, Kapoor is able to comment on the ever increasing influence of the Western world on Indian society at large while adopting similar elements from the critically acclaimed Charlie Chaplin, creating a Raj Kapoor special character that can stand alone and act as not just the Indian version of Chaplin's tramp but as Raj Kapoor's tramp.