Tuesday, January 26, 2016

1-26-16 Viewing Bollywood's Pyaasa

A movie shrouded in darkness, the viewer is presented with Guru Dutt's misfortunate, educated poet Vijay that endlessly struggles to be recognized for the talents of his craft that he went to school for.The general theme of sorrow and misfortune permeate the story as the vast majority of the scenes before Vijay wakes up from his coma. The same can generally be said of the score the audience hears. Vijay is featured in a majority of slow and somber musical scores and the only moments that ever become upbeat or positive are when Vijay is day-dreaming or when he runs into Gulab as she is reciting his poetry. The film attempts to capture the importance of artistry and poetry despite society not allotting any value or credence to such a craft and in many ways it does a good job of making this depiction but what caught my attention was the ways in which the romantic interests, Meena and Gulab are represented, the roles they play and what Dutt does to progress the narrative of these two characters and how Vijay is perhaps not a character to be whole-heartedly lauded or empathized with.
Vijay is nothing like Kapoor’s tramp character from Shree 420 in that he is not exactly a good protagonist. The earliest invitation to the character we learn that he is a struggling poet that, while indisputably talented, refuses to compromise his poetry by writing run-of-the-mill sentimental poems. As a result, he struggles. Vijay can’t get published, often can’t afford to eat, has no permanent home and often relies on others. One of the few isolated instances of Vijay attempting to help himself was when he acted as a coolie to (presumably) a taxi drive for some money to pay for that nights meal. Unfortunately, his efforts were fruitless in the sense that his payment turned out to be fake tender which nearly cost him his shirt only that he had his meal paid for him by Gulab which Vijay took as a form of pity for him. Gulab being a sex worker that has her own struggles to deal with, still offers to help someone in need despite her own situation in life.
Afterwards Vijay is left feeling as dejected as he was before. Even his friend and his friend’s female companion call Vijay a child. albeit jokingly, but the sentiment is true. Vijay clings to maintaining the integrity of his art and his pride as a poet but refuses to make any attempts at helping himself out in any way other than through his art. He is borderline narcissistic especially when early in the film, Vijay is shown haplessly trailing after a seductive singing Gulab wherein this scene it is interpreted a romantic gesture between Gulab and Vijay, following the many zoomed in shots of Gulab giving off sultry looks to Vijay, but also as a representation of Vijay chasing after his own art, his poetry, that Gulab happens to be singing. But then we have Gulab.
Gulab is an extremely hard-working mother that works as a sex-worker whom still is able to appreciate the arts by going out of her way to purchase some of Vijay’s works. She seems to be a common trope character for bollywood films who embodies all the Indian nationalistic values and morals as she is a very spirited, hard-working, open-hearted, selfless individual. She’s depicted as wearing what appears to be more traditional Indian clothing similar to the romantic interest in Shree 420, often the only illuminated element in most scenes, especially with Vijay as he is usually off-center or shadowed in some way. Gulab also exhibits a strong passion for Vijay though, wishing for him to succeed as she supports him even in his “death” which according to the one of the viewpoints from viewingbollywood.blogspot.com is part of what traditional Indian femininity looks like. This character being the powerful visage of what it means to be Indian comes as an impressively progressive one, particularly for the time, as among all of her outstanding qualities Gulab is in fact a sex-worker which typically is viewed with intense disdain and pity but Dutt makes a strong effort to remind the viewer of just how great she is through her actions that we forget she is a sex-worker until we’re faced with the jarring scene that features her performing for a client where her child is crying in the background.
It comes as no surprise then that the cover art for the film has Gulab front and center, taking up over half of the image next to Vijay. Gulab is the character that deserves to be appraised. Vijay is without a doubt talented, intelligent, and makes considerably apt and poignant commentary about society of the day in his poems, but he falls short in the other aforementioned ways whereas Gulab is the character that is a single mother, works a job and still has the kindness in her to aid the floundering yet talented artist that is Vijay. Gulab goes as far as using all her assets available to her just to have Vijay’s works published. Actions of a true protagonist to which has a foil meant to enhance her image -- through Meena.
Meena, however is a misjudged character in this series because we’re given a lot of reason as viewers to dislike her for her “materialism” and lack of morals when it comes to selling her love for wealth as Vijay puts it. Her interaction with Vijay at Mr. Ghosh’s party shows both the absurdity of Vijay’s expectations he put on Meena in the past and also how strong-willed Meena actually is. Dutt makes it quite apparent during Vijay’s song at the party that there was still residual love between Vijay and Meena as multiple times the camera fixates and zooms past party-goers to an isolated Meena standing in an empty hallway, or where we see Meena leaning against a doorway looking almost longingly at a singing Vijay, holding her hand over her mouth to mask her true emotions for Vijay.
After Vijay finishes reciting his poetry, he meets with Meena and they argue about why Meena left him. Vijay poises his argument in a fashion that shows Meena as being selfish for leaving him to marry into wealth with Mr. Ghosh when she apparently should have stayed with him and support him in his artistic endeavours. In an attempt to reinforce Vijay’s importance, he is depicted in his all white robes against a generally darker backdrop where he is often in direct lighting to set him apart from everything and everyone else, Meena included in her dark garb. Meena barely defends herself from Vijay’s accusations of abandonment and selfishness but in her saying she no longer wanted to be poor with Vijay, a stubborn man that refuses to work to support neither himself nor her, she doesn’t truly need to defend her decision to leave him. Whether or not Meena believed that Vijay’s artistic talents would ever amount to anything is not important -- symbolically, it may be -- but realistically, to the character, her well-being is arguably more paramount.
In the end, Guru Dutt produces a film that does wonders to bring to light the hypocrisy and corruption in society through a relatively dark and somber visual and musical experience as well as create what may be hailed as two strong female roles to contrast one another and yet show both ways that they thrive in the environment they find themselves in.

7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find your take on Vijay as a character that is not entirely to be celebrated to be really interesting. You bring up some interesting points about how he stubbornly chooses to pursue his career as a failed poet and chooses to avoid writing poetry about love that could potentially make him money. While all of this is true, I am not convinced that this is what Guru Dutt was trying to convey in his film. I don’t think that Vijay is supposed to be seen as “stubborn” so much as “dedicated.” In my opinion, Dutt is not trying to portray Vijay as someone who refuses to “get a real job” in favor of pursuing what he wants to do, even if he knows it will not support him. I think he is supposed to be a character that rejects the idea of a material world and stands by his convictions that his poetry can make a change in the world. However, from my own perspective, I agree with your appraisal of Vijay, and I think that from Meena’s perspective, this is an accurate view of Vijay. To Meena, who loved/loves him, it is a selfish act that he would expect her to settle for a life of poverty just so that he can pursue his poetry, so while I do not think that this is what Dutt is trying to portray, I do think that viewed from Meena’s perspective, it is a perfect interpretation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree full-heartedly that Dutt had no intention of Vijay being represented in such a fashion as I pointed at, but for me, I am merely arguing about how the character felt within the context of the film's universe. Don't get me wrong, I totally believe in the importance of art and I really enjoyed Dutt's message of artistry and the struggle that comes with the pursuit of something that, in a growing capitalistic world, yields either very little monetary value (as if that is the only value something can have) or a lot if one adheres to the status quo and creates what the masses want so that you may profit from their desires. Pushing the bill with art is extremely important as it gives people a voice to be heard and also allows for extremely open criticism of people, places, society at large, etc.

      So, I do believe in Dutt's message and feel that it is portrayed in the film, often times explicitly, but that the character that is Vijay, based on the interactions he has with the people in his life on screen, isn't as great a person as the viewer may think!

      Delete
    2. I would, however, likely argue that Gulab is a character that should be more studied because if she could write in the way that Vijay was able, she'd be an even better model for the power and prospect that comes with artistry.

      Delete
  3. Nathan, I enjoyed your analysis of the poster for the film. I hadn't taken the time to examine it prior to my post, but I believe your arguments to be spot on. In many regards, Gulab is the most redeemable character in the film, and her transformation over the course of the film is the most dynamic of any character in Pyaasa. I also find your interpretation about Vijay intriguing. I hadn't thought about his stubbornness about his art as an unwillingness to face facts and how this affects the people around him. Now that I think about it, he pretty much abandons his mother to the vileness of his brothers, inadvertently hastening her demise (possibly).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nathan,

    I like that you commented on the visual and musical aspects of the film, "The general theme of sorrow and misfortune permeate the story as the vast majority of the scenes before Vijay wakes up from his coma. The same can generally be said of the score the audience hears". It is interesting how the director uses the artistic aspects of film to make a commentary on art and society during that time period. I wonder how the film would have changed had the musical aspects not played so heavily with the story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nathan, I really enjoyed reading your post as you read Vijay's character against the grain. However, to complicate your reading a bit more: Vijay's lack of work is not necessarily his choice, that is, it is not that he refuses jobs to pursue his art. The 1950s were a period of great economic turbulence and unemployment. Despite having a B.A. degree, Vijay is unable to find a job because he is poor and doesn't have the social connections that will help him get a job. He leaves his home because he thinks that his mother's life will be a bit more comfortable if she doesn't have to protect him against his brothers. When he does get a job, he grabs it despite the fact that it is at a publishing house owned by Meena's husband. Yet, Vijay's rebellion against social expectations is definitely a white-collar protest as he doesn't really consider manual labor or physical work as a viable option. Interestingly, this makes the protagonist very different from Raju in Shri 420, who jumps at the chance of working at a laundry.

    ReplyDelete