Tuesday, February 23, 2016

2-23-16 Bhumika (The Role) - Identity



Benegal's Bhumika makes tactful use of color of clothing choices and frequency of change, camera shots, as well as flashback throughout the film in order to create a strong sense of uncertainty surrounding Usha, the protagonist, as she struggles to find an identity that best suits how she wishes to live her life. The film bounces around at different times of Usha's life, starting when in the present day shifting for a large portion of what could be considered the first half of the movie to Usha's past as a young girl up into her late teens or early twenties approximately. The last scene before the viewer moves entirely to the present features Usha rushing to her co-star, Rajan's home after she was accosted by her husband.

The transition to present from this point is through the incessant ringing of a phone with Rajan on the other line, which serves as another strong tie between the black and white flashback and the color film current time. Benegal's decision to add in this extra tie also depicts the extent to which Usha is plagued by her past as it and those she has chosen to cohort with, are continually involved and influencing her life. This pocked delivery of flashbacks throughout Bhumika does two things, it shows the sources for the identities that Usha attempts to engage with and also how ungrounded Usha feels with never being in one place very long.

Since Usha was a child she “is drawn to the classical music, which she learns from her grandmother, but rebels against her mother’s insistence that she learns household chores and demure behavior that would make her marriage material” and this desire at odds with the cultural construction of what is expected of those in feminine roles is the beginning for Usha in her struggle with how she wants and chooses to identify herself. In part as a rebellious act, Usha becomes a successful actress and is able to frequently pass through different identities within her roles in the films she plays in and then furthermore she becomes a parent herself and attempts to navigate between being a mother, a wife, and also a free and individualized person.

Another element to display this uncertainty and lack of full, wholesome identity is with the camera shots that typically portray Usha within either mostly medium shots, showing her from the waist up, or close-up shots wherein just Usha's head is visible. The effect of this decision to constantly minimize how much we see of Usha is to push this lack of identity because of the lack of being whole.

The scene in which Usha is helping Kale's wife and then they begin talking to each other is an important turning point for Usha as she realizes after his wife says "The beds change, the kitchens change. Men's masks change, but men don't change” to Usha while being a bedridden woman. Kale is an oppressive patriarchal figure all the same as every other man Usha has been involved with and the fact that Kale's wife is bedridden may be perceived as a result of his oppression over her and in her telling Usha that no matter how many times she moves from different lives with different men, the men never change and thus neither will she (Bhumika 2:01:58).

Towards the end of the film, Usha is seen wearing four vastly different colored outfits at different instances in quick succession. From vibrant red clothes during her talk with Kale's wife, to orange and subdued green when she speaks with Kale, to then green and yellow as she speaks with Kale's young son outside, and then all variants of blue whilst she gives a leg and foot massage to the grandmother living in Kale's estate. This rapid shift between colors and clothes represents Usha's attempt to shift between multiple roles for everyone involved in her life. It isn't until the final scene where Usha speaks with her now grown daughter after having left Kale's estate that she remains in her largely more dulled color clothes and tells herself that she must get used to her loneliness which is to say she must return to how she used to live with her husband. As mentioned in professor Ghosh's blog the clothing change may be an attempt to transition from the public to the private, domestic space” showing another example of how Usha's change in garb is a literal attempt to change her identity.


As mentioned in the Smita Patil photo tribute page, “these cinematic worlds of harsh truths, injustice, exploitation and the occasional triumph of individual rebellion” are ever present in Bhumika as Benegal shines light on the the serious societal pressures that fall on women in India and how problematic it can be to navigate one's life amidst a constant wave of hetero- and gender-normative societal expectations whilst trying to live a life for oneself. The stress of finding individual identity is amplified greatly by these pressures and expectations and Benegal's Usha is a fantastic catalyst to depict such a tumultuous life that many women were and likely still are facing in India. The unfortunate but sobering reality of this socio-cultural conundrum is materialized when Usha returns with her husband and in a medium long shot scene, she receives a phone call from Rajan who brings up the prospect of another film to her despite her making no indication to anyone other than her husband that she was returning. Usha, like so many other women, is not able to escape the roles of which she is seen in and now officially recognized.

5 comments:

  1. Nathan,
    I think what you said about Usha changing the color of her clothes in the film as an attempt to change her identity is very interesting. If this is true, which I think it is, then it adds another meaning to the black-and-white of the flashbacks. When she changes the color of her clothing, it is an attempt to change her identity, which is part of the reason that she changes her clothes so often, because she has a difficult time creating an identity for herself. When in black-and-white, however, though she still changes her clothes often, it is not always clear what colors the new outfits are. To me, this signifies her desire to create an identity for herself, but an inability to do so. In the flashback scenes, she is entirely under the control of either her mother or Keshav and she has very little control over her own life or how she chooses to identify herself. It is not until she leaves her husband entirely that the movie switches to color. I think the idea of the color of her clothing in the film that you pointed out makes an understanding of the film that much deeper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post, Nathan! I agree with everything that Shelby mentioned, but I also appreciate that you observed that the colors are in relation to the multiple roles she plays for the people in her life. I thought that was an interesting perspective. I hadn't considered her clothing very much, so I want to revisit the film with this in mind.

    What was your favorite scene in the film and why? One of the things that I enjoyed most in the cinematography was the scene transitions. I thought that the use of black and white vs color was very clear, but I especially enjoyed scenes with asynchronism as a transition. You would hear Usha singing before you would see it. Or in the beginning of the film, you hear her grandmother calling for her from a flashback as she is getting into a cab, and then she is running through the woods as a child. Very interesting choices.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think your mention of Usha's conflict of identity is very intuitive. I myself saw her true desire in life to not be in the cinema but rather to become a mother. In this way she could recreate a more positive version of her own childhood. We see her living this role when she moves to the mansion. Initially this fulfills her desire to be a traditional wife and mother with taking care of the young boy and rubbing the legs of the grandmother. It is only after she realizes this joy is an illusion of freedom that she becomes aware that the problem is not where she is but who she is. I think its in this moment that she realizes that her attempt to escape the theater was only a guise for running from her own loneliness.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just a comment that Usha does not return to live with her husband even if she doesn't divorce him. At the end, she tells her daughter that she will have to deal with her loneliness on her own, connoting a move towards self-reliance. The use of her grandmother's music record in the background suggests that Usha's salvation lies in artistic fulfillment instead of domestic happiness.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's interesting that you interpret the camera shots, especially the close-ups of Usha, as the film's way of demonstrating her fragmented identity. Generally, close-ups are used in film as a means of bringing the character's emotional state to the foreground. Does the film use extreme close-ups (shots of just her eyes or hands)? Those would serve to affirm your reading. Also, is there a difference in the way Usha is shot versus other characters? Are others also not presented through medium shots and close-ups? I'm thinking of the first scene where we see multiple close-ups of Keshav.

    ReplyDelete