Mira
Nair's Monsoon Wedding, successfully tackles the
difficult task of creating a film that is globally accessible
(excluding the obvious limitations of representing every language and
culture) and with the lofty decision to do so, Nair's movie takes on
sexuality in different ways through its bevvy of differentiated
characters. The expression of various elements of sexuality is in
some way a boon directly tied to the decision to create a film aimed,
in part, at the Western audiences as well as Indian audiences.
With
characters coming from Australia, Southwest Asia, America, and India
for a wedding, almost ironically, the first important character and
scene we see them in is, what we learn in retrospect, of an affair
between to-be-wed Aditi and her ex-boyfriend. Aditi, being one of the
characters living in India. The irony of her characters actions is
that it goes against the traditionally conservative and normative
(arguably more female) Indian relationship. But when we reach the few
shots regarding Tej and his young niece, there comes such an
effective instillation of concern over the their relationship
together using a shot that deliberately blocks out Tej from view as
he bends over Aliya to feed her, slowly revealing Tej as Ria gets
closer to the door. This development, as Jenny Sharpe writes in her
book “Gender, Nation, And Globalization,” is “the
disturbing topic of sexual molestation—a subject too controversial
for popular Indian cinema,” and
is one that is able to be included due to Nair making the movie under
their New York-based company, Mirabai Films (Sharpe 61).
Having
a New York-based company to produce the film through is not exactly
enough to avoid alienating too large a population of viewers and so
Nair specifically maintains multiple story arcs which buttress the
film as a whole but also soften the serious, and in the case of Tej,
sinister alternate
plots. Of these various plots, we also see Varun's troubling
relationship with his parents as they struggle (mostly the father) to
understand/accept their son's very likely homosexuality and actually
plan to send him to boarding school in an attempt to somehow squelch
the homosexuality out of him by surrounding him with more boys
(logic). Varun's arc within the movie is received globally by the
west and in India in likely a similar way as in the early 2000s, when
narratives surrounding homosexuality were
making slow integrations into popular culture and cinema in
positive and less stereotypical ways. Nair blends Varun's sexuality
into the milieu of the film without ham-fistedly expressing it
through characterization. By presenting this film with the globalized
scope that is has, Varun stands as a character that is able to be
accepted by merely depicting the realistic struggles that he faces
with his parents.
We
also have the young, lust-driven romance between Rahul and Ayesha,
the two frequently stealing glances at each other as well as show
Ayesha sneaking off into the night, scantily clothed, to meet Rahul,
who is just in his underwear. Before this scene, we see Ayesha
practicing their dance routine together when Rahul enters the room
and Ayesha immediately runs up to him to flaunt in front of him, the
camera hastily following along and zooming in to position itself at
Rahul's eye-level, keeping Ayesha's lower half of her body as the
centerpiece for as much as the shot as possible to further suggest
her sexual nature and Rahul's willing sexual appetite.
And
then there is the earnest romance between Dubey and Alice who exhibit
more of a traditional Bollywood style flirtation with their innocent
looks and youthful, uncomfortable and quiet amour shared with each
other throughout the movie.
Rahul
and Ayesha represent the non-traditional while Dubey and Alice
represent the traditional. Both romances project a certain notion of
egalitarianism by Dubey marrying beneath his caste and by Ayesha
willing exploring her own sexual self without the guidance or
restriction of a patriarchal presence. As Jamila mentions in her
presentation, the women in the film, like Aditi, are able to choose
“to be a sexual being.” The same freedom is given to Ria (as well
as Aliya), not sexually, but as a character that had specifically
been taken advantage of by a patriarchal figure as a young girl and
was later in the film released from this power dynamic with the help
of Lalit in his public demonstration to remove Tej from the party,
and likely from the family in a larger sense.
Overall,
the film takes many liberties with the blending of western and Indian
cultural norms, traditions, and other commentaries in order to create
a globally inviting film with content accessible to all while also
pushing a sexually progressive and feminist narrative with virtually
all of its characters like Aditi, Varun, Ayesha, Ria and Alice. The
success with these narratives also comes with the territory of the
globalized approach in that it is able to take pieces of culture from
the west and India and the complications of each and provide
commentary on both which suggests a certain message of trans-nationality with the events that unfold throughout the film as
though these experiences are not necessarily indigenous to only one
place.
Side
notes: Rahul is an impregnable wall when it comes to insults slung at
him from Lalit. It was hilarious at first because Rahul seems like
such a burnout and can't seem to be responsible for anything even his
own safety (injured hand) but by the end I couldn't help but start to
feel sort of sorry for him because that literally just was the way he
was addressed each time by Lalit, as an idiot.
I
also absolutely loved how Nair presented the situations surrounding
Varun, Ria, Aliya and Tej. Neither were told to the audience or
deliberately shown, they were relatively subtle and arguably your
suspicions are then later reaffirmed near the end of the film but the
shots that lead up to those resolutions/explanations kept the viewer
in suspense to know more about the character developments.
Nathan,
ReplyDeleteI find it really interesting that you brought up Ria in your discussion of sexuality. I would not have thought of her since she isn't sexual in the same way that Aditi and Aliya are. So far as we know in the film, Ria's only experience with sex has been forced on her by her uncle when she was a child, and even if the film doesn't explicitly state it, it would not be unreasonable to assume that she has been afraid to get intimate with anyone following her traumatic experience as a child. Throughout the film, people make comments about the fact that she isn't married: Aditi jokes about taking marriage advice from her older, unmarried cousin. When they are having Aditi's engagement party, relatives hint that it will be Ria's turn next. However, she fully rejects the idea until the very end of the film, after Tej has been revealed as a child molester and removed from the wedding party. At the end of the film, she shares a look with a late arrival to the wedding, implying that they might begin a relationship together. From a very realistic perspective, it makes sense that Ria is unable to entertain the idea of marriage or a relationship until she is free of her abuser. From a cinematic perspective, it could be seen as symbolic--only when she is free from the patriarchal sexuality that has been forced on her can she make the choice to engage in her own sexuality with a partner of her choosing.
Great post!
Very interesting discussion of sexuality in the film, Nathan. I would add the film's exploration of Lalit and Pimmi's marriage, intimacy, and sexuality within the marriage. Overworked and hassled, Lalit is oblivious to Pimmiis desire for intimacy; it is only when he is shaken by Tej's betrayal of the family that we find a very tender moment between them. The film explores how something positive may emerge even out of tragedies that beset us.
ReplyDeleteAlso, a note of clarification: Dubey and Alice's marriage is inter-religious since the former is Hindu and the latter is Christian.
ReplyDelete