Gang
membership and their family extension is very much at the heart of
poverty and gang presence in virtually any urban area. Satya is a
film that does this element of gang mentality and existence justice
as the main character, Satya, befriends Bhiku in prison and later
becomes enrolled in a gang which is as much akin to a family as
possible for someone like Satya. The gangster genre of film as a
whole, however, does not always represent this underworld with much
accuracy and instead draws “on the mythology of the underworld”
(Mazumdar 149). Most often these films shy away from genuine realism
or focusing on true aspects of the humanity involved in the
underworld, but Satya is one of few films that became popular by
depicting a gritty, honest image of what the “underworld” looks
like and how the people involved get to where they are. As Susan
quotes from the director of Satya in an interview, the film is meant
to address the human side of the underworld and “why a man picks up
the gun.”
The
genre itself doesn't seem to contest with the typical trends of
popular Hindi cinema so much as exemplify them. Even the most
light-hearted Bollywood films we have seen have still tackled serious
societal discourse though presenting it often surrounded by other
story arcs and scenes that make these criticisms or commentaries more
digestible. Satya and others of the same ilk do without any liquids
and demands the pill be taken as is. What the genre, if following in
the same vein as Satya, does complicate and interrogate is, no pun
intended, the truth.
The
interest in what people involved in the underworld do in between
their hits and other gang related activities that the director
projects into the film does exactly what Susan notes in her
presentation: it creates a grey area immediately as these otherwise
“bad guys” are humanized and are ultimately a product of their
environment like Commissioner Amod suggests. And the juxtaposition
between communion scenes around the dinner table at police officer's
homes to members of the chawl and then with the gang meeting, the
film creates an ambiguity around the actions taken by each character
to some extent. It is not black and white as Susan mentions. There is
no one verifiable bad guy or good guy. Instead, we just have people
trying to navigate an unfortunately corrupt and impoverished
cityscape from different angles with the network and skills that they
know.
When
it comes to humanizing the underworld characters, the main character
of the film's romance and familial bond with his gang are what
represents the ambiguous and realistic depiction of life in poverty
within a gang. Firstly, Satya is a person seemingly devoid of emotion
or care when we first meet him, admitting to Bhiku that he does not
fear death, which we, the viewers, can safely believe is true given
that the first 30 minutes of the film involve Satya either beating or
getting beaten by someone, going as far as having a gun pointed at
him. The first thing to put a smile on this hardened characters face
is the friendship between him and Bhiku who then takes Satya under
his wing and adopts him into his gang which stands in as his family.
From there, we are shown numerous invitations by Bhiku for Satya to
come to his home and meet his wife and kids, or the other several
occassions of communion between Satya and the rest of the gang
members. Professor Ghosh makes note of the scene showing the contrast
of windows between Vidya and Satya, with Satya behind bars and Vidya
amidst a bushel of greenery and her arms stretching wide which
suggests the entrapment that Satya feels by his position later in the
film after he finally meets and falls in love with Vidya. With Vidya
involved, this is the first time that he has have called in to
question his lifestyle either before or during his crime-life. Vidya,
the innocent, hardworking neighbor in the chawl is what brings Satya
down from his life and seeks a way out but through a series of
unfortunate events, he is abandoned by his family and feels obligated
to get revenge on the man that disrupted and ended the lives of his
gang family.
These
experiences that create such a conflicted character out of a
previously empty person are a true testament to what poverty does to
push people to these extreme positions, what gang community provides
for lost or impoverished individuals, and what friendship and love
can do to promote change or provide sanctuary. These elements come
together and illuminate an otherwise demonized part of society
without perpetuating the flashy, glamor of other gangster genre films
which often completely skip over the social, human experiences that
truly drive these institutions.
As a general aside: The actor for Satya did not hold my attention well and I couldn't tell if he was just bad at acting or if he was playing a down and out character too well. I will admit that the film becomes more interesting and impressive after thinking and reading about it critically and within real life context.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI too was underwhelmed by Chakravarthy's performance of Satya's role, but I think that that adds to my enjoyment of the film. I'm not caught up in the glamor of the individual gangster, but I can actually appreciate characters like Bhiku and Vidya.
ReplyDeleteWell-written post. I especially liked your discussion of Satya's character and how it evolves from a gloomy, monosyllabic temperament to someone who is capable of friendship and love. It is this humanity (his desire to meet Vidya one last time) that gets him killed and makes him a tragic figure. In terms of what may be improved: focus on cinematic elements, such as sound, lighting, shot composition, a bit more to add more depth to analysis.
ReplyDelete